Sunday, December 28, 2008

Action Alert: Idaho Transportation Dept Pedestrian and Bicycle Survey

The Idaho Transportation Department is seeking your input through a survey. If you are interested in bicycle or pedestrian mobility in Teton Valley and Idaho we encourage you to fill out this survey. All survey responses are confidential. Completing the survey will enable you to participate in establishing a new vision for non-motorized mobility within Idaho and provide needed insight to all agencies that make non-motorized mobility decisions. Thank you in advance for your participation.

To access the survey go to: http://itd.idaho.gov/planning/bike/2008PlanSurvey.html

Here are a few of my responses:

5. Tell us if you are aware of any bicycle or pedestrian mobility concerns that may be unique to your community.

"We are situated on the West side of Teton Pass which separates us from Jackson, WY. We are in need of completing the non-motorized pathway over Teton Pass. Currently there is a pathway on the East side of the path, but not one on the West side. This connection is important for residents who work in Jackson as well as tourists who visit the area."

6.Tell us about any issues, concerns or frustrations that you currently experience related to your interaction with the Idaho Transportation Department concerning bicycle and pedestrian mobility. Do you have suggestions for improvement?

"Overall I am frustrated that Gov. Otter's and ITD's transportation initiative focuses entirely on outdated methods of transportation infrastructure development. It is time we move away from only funding auto-centric methods of transportation. I would like to see more attention devoted to multi-modal transportation that reduces the number of yearly Vehicle Miles Traveled. I do realize this has the negative affect of further reducing income from gas tax, but this too is an outdated method of structuring our transportation system. It is time we devoted serious attention and resources to non-conventional methods of traveling around our state both at the local and regional level. Of course we must maintain the highways and bridges we already have, but creating more miles of asphalt that caters to auto dependent development patterns is wrong."

7. Tell us about any issues, concerns or frustrations that you currently experience related to your interaction with state elected officials concerning bicycle and pedestrian mobility. Do you have suggestions for improvement?

"At the 2008 AIC conference as well as the Idaho Falls transportation conference my requests for more support for multi-modal transportation projects were largely ignored. The response I kept getting was, "But we have to maintain the infrastructure of highways and bridges we already". Obviously the fact that I repeatedly focused my comments on new highway projects and road widening projects was missed. I suggest that State Officials recognize that national development trends are moving away from Suburban development and towards compact, pedestrian friendly development. This return to compact development patterns needs governmental support for non motorized transportation infrastructure."

8. Tell us if your governmental agency supports infrastructure improvements for bicycling and walking. If yes, how do you do this?

"The City of Victor requires all new developments to construct sidewalks and bicycle paths that connect to our existing network. We also support our local advocacy group, Teton Valley Trails and Pathways. Recently we passed an ordinance requiring Main St property owners to plow their sidewalks and we are working with Landsman Transportation on a new Transportation Plan that will include pedestrian and cycling improvements."

9. Please tell us any other thoughts concerning bicycle and pedestrian mobility.

"Please do not continue to pull funding for enhancement grants that can help grow our pedestrian and cycling infrastructure. I realize we are in a budget shortfall, but cutting good programs that can be part of a larger solution to our problems is not the answer. It is time to look beyond the transportation development trends of the last 50 years and find new solutions to our new problems."

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Envision Victor Project Coordinator Job Announcement

ENVISION VICTOR:
PROJECT COORDINATOR/CONTRACT POSITION
JOB ANNOUNCEMENT

Background
In January 2008, the Orton Family Foundation issued a Request for Proposals to select two communities in the Rocky Mountain region and two in the Northeast willing to undertake an innovative two-year project developing a “Community Heart & Soul” approach to planning. Based on Victor’s excellent application and a subsequent site visit by Foundation staff, the Foundation chose Victor as one of four Heart & Soul community projects.
Envision Victor is a partnership between the Orton Family Foundation, the City of Victor, Valley Advocates for Responsible Development, and Teton Valley Trails and Pathways. The project will ask all Victor residents to identify, articulate, and implement Victor’s Heart & Soul. Envision Victor will “go beyond land use and design, and toward our social fabric and how [to] create opportunities to grow a more economically, ecologically, and socially diverse community.” Envision Victor will also leverage the results from Victor’s Community Action Plan, ongoing work revising Victor’s Comprehensive Plan, and Victor’s EPA-funded Smart Growth Implementation Report, and other work completed by Victor’s citizens.


Coordinator Position
The Project Coordinator will be Envision Victor’s public face and main contact person for community members, local government, media, funders, and vendors. It will be a contract position starting in January 2009 and running through December 2011. We anticipate a time commitment of at least 20 hours per week. Expenses such as phone calls, mileage, and out-of-pocket expenses will be reimbursed at cost.

The Project Coordinator will contract directly with the Orton Family Foundation (Foundation) and will be supervised by the Orton Family Foundation and the Envision Victor Advisory Committee and will collaborate with the City of Victor, Valley Advocates for Responsible Development, and Teton Valley Trails and Pathways (Project Partners).

For a full description of the position please visit www.EnvisionVictor.blogspot.com

Monday, December 8, 2008

City Council Agenda 12-10-08

7:00 Pledge of Allegiance & Review of Minutes

7:10 Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345(f)

P&Z

Urban Renewal

Maintenance

Administrative

County Prosecutor

County Commissioner Meetings

Final Orton Partnership Agreement

Hiring of a Grant Writer

Calendaring

January 22-24, 2009 – New Partners for Smart Growth

Bills

City Council Minutes 11-12-08

DRAFT MINUTES

Council President David Kearsley called the meeting to order. Councilmen present were Richard Naef, David Bergart, and Scott Fitzgerald. Mayor Don Thompson joined the meeting shortly after.

The amended minutes of the October 22nd council meeting were motioned and seconded for approval. The ayes were unanimous.

Russell Jones- Property Issue
Arnold Woolstenhulme from A&W Engineering represented Russell Jones, owner of 141 West Birch. Mr. Woolstenhulme presented to the Council a copy of a plat of the property. This plat shows that in the 1950’s a house and a garage was built in the street easement. Mr. Jones is requesting a boundary adjustment from the Council. Currently there is a 99-foot right of way down West Birch Street and the minimum required for the city is 60 feet. Mr. Jones also asked Council to look at the LID billing for the street paving. Council asked Mr. Woolstenhulme to put together some maps and more information for review.

Alice Stevenson- County Commissioner Visit with Council
County Commissioner Alice Stevenson asked the Council for suggestions with the state liquor licenses to be issued on a County level instead of being issued by the State. County is in support and would like feed back from the City. The Council will check with the Association of Idaho Cities and get back to Mrs. Stevenson.

Discussion was held with Mrs. Stevenson regarding the Impact Area. The County Commissioners requests working out a defined boundary not just a proposed. The County suggests ordinances to be in place to support the zones, and the city shouldn’t have less density than the County in that area. The County has three main concerns: one is creating to many hoops for the public to jump through if the rules are the same in City as the County; the public not having proper representation, and farmers being surrounded by subdivisions.

Mayor Don Thompson explained to Mrs. Stevenson the concern the City has with property asking for annexations into the City outside of the current Impact Area, the City has outgrown the current boundaries and that is the reason for the application the expand the Impact Area.

Councilman Richard Naef explained how much a development on the outside the city limits has impacts on the city. Mr. Naef stated that the City need to be informed on what is being approved by the County. The City has concern with one of the city’s main water supply in the Game Creek area that has county subdivisions being approved with septic tanks to contaminate that supply. Mr. Naef informed Mrs. Stevenson that the Council gave a copy of the proposed ordinances to the County for review and the Council is waiting for a response. Mr. Naef would like to see a PUD for the Impact Area to control connectivity to water and sewer.

Mrs. Stevenson informed the Council that the only problem she sees with the application is the boundaries and once that issue is worked out she doesn’t feel there should be any problem with it passing.

Mrs. Stevenson updated the Council on the Teton County Housing Authority. They are working getting eligible people that work on the west side of the Tetons affordable housing. Council feels that the County and cities all need to adopt the same ordinance when it’s created.

Mrs. Stevenson updated the Council regarding the Humane Society. The County budgeted for an animal control officer and $5,000.00 for housing of the animals.
The County has asked them to submit a contract for review; this has not been submitted at this time. The County did get a contract to review from a company called For The Animals out of Idaho Falls. The contract would require $35,000.00 per year. The County would like to have the city help with the funding. Council agreed that the city needs a contract of our own to control the dog problem.

Travis Thompson- Update on Projects
Mathew Look, from the Development and Funding of Community Infrastructure Districts group, accompanied Travis Thompson, explained how CID funding works. CID funding is for public infrastructure that will eventually be turned over to the city. Council had concern about who makes the payment if the development slows down and Mr. Look stated that the developer is responsible for that payment. The first step is to form a district with three council members serving on the board. Mr. Look also explained to the Council that if the infrastructure amount is over the bond amount, the developer is responsible to pay the difference. The infrastructure is done in phases and the members of the board have to approve each phase before the issuing of the debt. The lots will be assessed on a per lot base to determine the debt owed for the infrastructure. The buyer in the districts with CID funding in place will have a discloser to sign at closing so they will be aware of the debt as required by state law. Unused money could be used for maintenance and improvements. Travis Thompson then asked the Council permission to move forward in submitting a petition to form the district. Mr. Thompson agreed to cover the cost of forming that district. Discussion was held by the Council in regards to this being a way to boost the economy.

Motion was made and seconded to allow a petition be submitted for a CID. The ayes were unanimous.


Maintenance- Timberline Ranch- Issuing a CO
Public Works Director Scott Golden explained to the Council that he was misinformed about an issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy requested by Robert Kaptein, owner of 283 Timberline Ranch. Mr. Golden will issue the CO, due to the Council approving the issuance of the CO in the minutes of the meeting on February 27th, 2008. Mike Potter was present regarding the CO. Council agreed the CO should be issued. Mr. Golden informed the Council the roads in the subdivision have not been approved due to a punch list that is not complete. Discussion was held regarding the snow plowing in the subdivision, Council informed Mr. Golden that the Kaptain house needs to be plowed out for reasoning of emergency safety.

Mr. Golden updated the Council that a letter has been sent to the developer of the Cowboy Road House informing them that the city will not be plowing the roads in development until the punch list is complete.

Mr. Golden informed the Council that in 2009 Ground Water Rules are changing and it will require a chlorination system to be installed at the springs in Game Creek. Council asked Mr. Golden to get estimates and submit it for review.

Mr. Golden asked permission of the Council to place snowplowing signs though out the city to let the public aware of the parking ordinance. Permission was granted.

Mr. Golden informed the Council that the steam cleaner budgeted for was purchased.

A short discussion was held in regards to installing more streetlights at Main and Dogwood. Mr. Golden was asked to look into options to address the lighting problem.

P&Z – Victor Crossroads
Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden gave the Council a letter received by Victor Crossroads informing the City of withdrawing their application for a Special Use Permit. Discussion was held on the issue. Council asked Mrs. Golden to have the City Attorney respond to the letter.

P&Z- LHTAC Grant
Planning Director Bill Knight informed the Council he has been working on an application for a grant called the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council to assist in projects in the City.



P&Z
City Engineer Rob Heuseveldt gave the Council examples for submittal of preliminary plat as requested in previous meeting. Discussion was held as Mr. Heuseveldt explained the examples to Council. Council will review them.

Administrative
Council agreed not to assist in the funding of the Cloud Seeding Program.

Discussion was held regarding a name for the alleyway by Clea Morgan’s.
Motion was made and seconded to name the alleyway Arrowroot Alley. The ayes were unanimous.

Councilman Bergart asked the Council for thoughts on putting the lights in Pioneer Park on a timer for public to use for a Nordic track during the winter months. Council supported the idea and asked Public Works Director Scott Golden to get some cost estimates for review.

Mr. Bergart informed the Council of an upcoming conference in January 2009 called New Partners for Smart Growth in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Mr. Bergart feels it would be good to send someone to.

Discussion was held in regards to a letter received by Roy Barillaro asking the Council for a reduction in his water bill. In July 2008, a local cowboy was living in his garage without permission and ran up the water bill. Council would like to have Mr. Barillaro’s response to the request of his participation of the alleyway to the rear of his property.

Council agreed to allow the church called the Third Day Worship and Ward use the Council Chambers on Saturday’s with a signed contract.

City Billing Clerk Amy Underwood gave the Council finding on the cost for the State to collect the local tax for the city. Estimates were between $100,000 and $150,000 to a software developer, $20,000 for the development from the State, and a $130,000 yearly maintenance fee. Council agreed this is not cost effective for the City.

Bills
A motion was made, seconded and the ayes were unanimous to pay the bills. The meeting was then adjourned.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

City Council Minutes 10-22-08

Mayor Don Thompson called the meeting to order. Councilmen present were Richard Naef, David Kearsley, David Bergart, and Scott Fitzgerald.

The amended minutes of the October 8th council meeting were motioned and seconded for approval. The ayes were unanimous.

The Council received an update on Wrangler's Ridge subdivision in regards to the Fema floodpplain. FEMA is ok with the conditional use permit for the park as long as there are no structures with 4 walls.

Kurt Hibbert- Codifying Code Book
Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden asked Kurt Hibbert to talk to the Council about codifying the City Code Book. Mr. Hibbert informed Council the city would get a digital copy so any future changes could be made by the city. Council asked Mrs. Golden and Mr. Hibbert to put together a scope of work and a priority list, for the next council meeting to be reviewed.

Chapter 3 of Ordinance Book
Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden read though changes to Chapter 3 of the Ordinances. Herb Heimral explained to the Council how confusing the current ordinance is for builders and developers. Council asked City Engineer Rob Huesevelt to get a sample packet together of what should be required for different stages of applications. After much discussion, changes were made. The review of this ordinance was postponed due to time. Staff was asked to review the role of the P&Z commission with our attorney Stephaney Boney.

Tree Ordinance- Revisions
Becky Franklin, a representative of the Tree Committee, presented the changes made to the tree ordinance. Council had concerns with the bonding issue, and the number of trees required per lot in each zone. Mrs. Franklin will take the concerns back to the committee and get back with the Council. Other changes were made after much discussion.

Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden ask the Council to approve the plant unit alternatives and the list of types of trees for the area.

A motion was made, seconded to approve the plant unit alternatives and the tree list. The ayes were unanimous.

Sewer Bond – Update
City Engineer Rob Huesevelt gave the Council an update on the sewer bond. The application will be resubmitted to DEQ with corrections. The archeological study should be complete later this week and then turned into DEQ with the corrected application. The ordinance for the sewer bond will be reviewed on December 10th, 2008.

Mr. Huesevelt informed the Council that he is currently working on an updated version of the water and sewer portion of the Capital Facility Plan and will have that for Council to review in December.


Water Rights Lawsuit- Update
Mr. Huesevelt asked the Council to approve Bruce Smith to sign the State Water Rights Adjudication Lawsuit. A motion was made and seconded to allow permission for Mr. Smith to sign the lawsuit case # 39576. The ayes were unanimous.

Planning and Zoning-Ordinances Reviewed
Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden went through changes to Chapter 1 and 2 of the ordinances. Additional changes were recommended.

Mrs. Golden went through the Major/Minor Projects Ordinance and the Definitions with the Council. Brief discussion was held. Changes were made but it will be brought back to the council for further review.

Administrative
City Administrator Craig Sherman asked the Council for direction on the Local Option Sales Tax Ordinance. The Council asked Mr. Sherman to get information from the State regarding the administration and collection of the sales tax. Mr. Sherman will get the information together for review. The council feels comfortable seeking a 1/2% tax on all taxable items.

Mr. Sherman informed the Council the High Country RCD is looking for a donation for cloud seeding funding. Council will review and discuss at a later time.

Administrator Sherman handed out the end of the year budget reports. Mr. Sherman informed the Council that City Auditor Bob Hardy will be in the office the first week in December and an update will be given to the Council at the December 10th meeting.

Bills
A motion was made, seconded and the ayes were unanimous to pay the bills. The meeting was then adjourned.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

City Council Agenda for 11-12-08

7:00 Pledge of Allegiance & Review of Minutes
7:10 Russ Jones – Property Issue
7:30 Reg Ethington – Public Hearing - Zoning Change
8:30 Travis Thompson – Update on Projects

Visitors

P&Z
Victor Crossroads
Parking Issues

Maintenance
Groundwater Chlorination

Administrative
Roy Barillaro Bill Dispute

Calendaring
Winter Holiday Festival – Saturday, December 6

Bills

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Transportation Questionnaire Results

Carol Landsman (Landsman Transportation) has compiled the results of the Transportation Plan Questionnaire. Please click HERE to see the results.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

New Envision Victor Website

So that you can easily find information pertaining to Envision Victor, we have set up a blog specific to the project. You can find a link on the menu to the right or click the link below:


This blog will return to its original mission of providing weekly information about the City of Victor. Come back to read City Council minutes, agendas, etc. Thanks!
October 8, 2008 Victor City Hall


CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES - DRAFT

Council President David Kearsley called the meeting to order with Councilmen Bergart and Fitzgerald in attendance. The minutes of the September 24, 2008 meeting with noted corrections were motioned and seconded for approval. The ayes were unanimous.

City of Victor – Water Rights
Rob Heuseveldt from Sunrise Engineering discussed an issue regarding certain water rights with the Department of Water Resources and gave Council a copy of correspondence received from our law firm. Mr. Heuseveldt then gave a little history on these rights (22-566A and 22-122) and after research was completed it was found that even with the recommended changes, the city has an adequate amount of water rights. The city found no objection to the time limitation on the period of use for irrigation (April 15 to October 15 of each year).

After brief discussion, a motion was made and seconded to grant approval for the Mayor to sign the SF5 forms. The ayes were unanimous.

Hoback Investments
Bill Weiss, representing the Hoback partnership, addressed the Council on two issues that the partnership has with the Memorandum of Understanding. The group is questioning why the city is asking for access through their property to the other buildings directly south of their location. Mr. Weiss believes that this seems to favor the old theater and was under the impression that the neighbors could negotiate this without the city being involved. He was also concerned about how this would affect their parking as they are three spaces short according to the present ordinance. Carolyn Burke also voiced concerns about the intent of this access.

Councilman Kearsley explained that this is ordinance driven and they must provide an access that gives the ability to go from one property to another. This access is needed for delivery vehicles so they do not have to go back to the highway to reach their delivery site. The opinion of City Attorney Paul Fitzer, who was video conferenced in to the meeting, concurs with Council’s and that Hoback Investments will have to provide the access.

Amber Gugeler of Letham Architects read a letter from Mike Wolken (who owns the old theater) and wanted his opinion known as to where he believes the alleyway should be. As the Letham firm represents both neighboring clients, she also raised the concern about having to relocate the site of the dumpster if the access has to go through the property.
Council expressed that the city want to design where this access goes and that the property owners could get together and work it out. The city is requiring an access that delivery trucks can go through. Surveying where the sewer lines are is one suggestion that P&Z Administrator Cari Golden stated was in the staff report.

Public Hearing – Wrangler’s Ridge – Final Plat
Council President Kearsley went through the proper procedures to commence the beginning of this public hearing after designating the proper location. There was no conflict of interest. Sunrise Engineering’s Rob Heuseveldt went over a letter that was sent to the applicant in August and stated that the majority of requested items had been completed. Mr. Heuseveldt stated that all the construction drawings pertaining to the planned lift station elevation would have to go before a DEQ approval meeting.

Discussion was held concerning the intersection of Highway 33 and 700 South with the required left turn lane. If the applicants do not put this turn lane in, they will be subject to paying the piggyback amount to whoever puts the turn lane in.

There was also discussion held about incorporating this lift station into the Capital Facilities plan and this could be a regional lift station (it has been sized for the regional station). There was also discussion about water recapture being owed to Victor Mountain Retreat, LLC due to the new well. There needs to be something submitted to FEMA regarding the flood plain as per the Williams Engineering firm’s consultation, even though this is located in the park. This will be required of A-W Engineering to submit.

Planning and Zoning Administrator Cari Golden gave the staff report. She stated similar concerns that Mr. Heuseveldt expressed and added the covered shelter in the park being dedicated to the city wasn’t shown and exhibits that are needed for the development agreement. Developer is interested in doing this project in phasing.

Arnold Woolstenhulme, of A-W Engineering, stated that he is aware of the flood plain issues and showed Council that the floodplain is shown as an easement on his plat drawing. He questioned the FEMA map and that this property is on the end of the floodplain. How does this end in the middle of nowhere? If Council determines the FEMA study must be completed, it will be done.

He also covered the subject of the roadway on 100 West and rebuilding of 700 South when new lift station is put in. Randy Woolstenhulme has agreed to the lift station being put on his property. Discussions have been held with Travis Thompson and he is in favor of the location for the lift station.

Legrand Woolstenhulme then addressed Council regarding the construction of Phases 1 and 2 of the project and how these lots are not backed up against the flood plain and how the FEMA plan would be completed before the bonding for construction of Phase 3. He also stated that they have volunteered to pave 100 West past their development to and are asking that the work on Highway 33 be postponed until the third phase of their project’s development. The fragility of the nation’s economy and the sale of lots were mentioned as factors.

Discussion was held about the park location and how it might join in with another park if another development came in on the south end of the parcel. The developers will move the park wherever the city designates and this will be an issue that will be addressed for the Phase 3 developer’s agreement.

More discussion was held on the flood plain issue and how it is almost impossible for flood waters to get to this development. . Pathway issues in Phase One were also discussed to Council’s satisfaction. The Woolstenhulmes are committed to taking care of the floodplain issues, have actually begun working with the process and hope to have closure on the FEMA study within a month and will do whatever the city requests.

Councilman Kearsley did inform all that lot owners must understand that flood insurance will need to be purchased with their lots if the lot is located in the floodplain. Discussion was held on whether this project can be approved without having the FEMA study available. The city would be approving the master plan, not plat with the phasing. The developer would prefer having Phase One approved.

The hearing was then opened for public comment. Lucy Flood of VARD requested more discussion about the construction of the park in the floodplain and if what is going in would have to be FEMA approved.

Arnold Woolstenhulme envisions keeping the park as natural and pristine as possible and keep it simple and basic. The path and picnic table will have little impact on floodplain.

The public comment portion of the hearing was closed.

Timberline is another development with floodplain issues and they had no problems with getting their park approved.

The park in Phase One was discussed and it is big enough for the number of lots shown. The number of accesses for Phase One were discussed and it will be addressed in the development agreement for Phase One.

Council discussed various items concerning the project and asked questions of staff for clarification purposes. All seemed comfortable with the answers and language for the motion was clear.

A motion was made and seconded to approve the final plat for Wrangler’s Ridge Subdivision, conditional on verification of FEMA’s requirements for floodplain issues, approve the construction of Phase One (work out details in development agreement), developer needs to have the lift station information changed and the easement obtained, developers agree to pave 100 West in Phase One, participate in an upgrade to Highway 33 and 700 South (to be reviewed in Phase Two during development agreement discussion), have the option to move the park (or improvements) as they come to Phase 3 (based on FEMA decision), will provide plans for 100 West road improvements and bike path connections (to be detailed in DA). The ayes were unanimous.

Public Hearing – Architectural Stamp Requirement
(Over 2,500 Square Feet) Ordinance
Council President Kearsley went through the proper procedures to commence the beginning of this public hearing. No conflict of interest was declared. City Planner Bill Knight gave the staff report and explained the need for quality buildings being constructed and how the square footage was determined. He mentioned that developers are asking that this requirement be made for all to follow.

The hearing was then opened for public comment. No comment was given and the public comment portion of the hearing was closed.

Brief deliberation followed and a motion was made and seconded to pass the architectural stamp requirement as Ordinance 08-10-08. The ayes were unanimous.

Tree Ordinance Review
P&Z Administrator Cari Golden discussed the revisions made to the Tree Ordinance. Brief discussion was held as to whether or not the changes are for ordinance or resolution purposes. Our attorney needs to be consulted. Since not everyone had the materials in front of them, this issue will be on the agenda for the October 22nd quarterly work meeting.

Maintenance
City Engineer Rob Heuseveldt gave an update on the progress with the sewer treatment plant. Willie Teuscher’s facilities study should be ready by next week. Stephanie Crockett has been hired to do the archeological study and the report should be ready in three weeks. Driggs has provided all necessary information and DEQ will potentially sign-off on their pilot project. Design work for our plant is moving along and as soon as the facilities study is approved, cost estimations can start being gathered.

There are a few projects that still have not completed punchlist items that were requested. Mr. Heuseveldt has been directed to draft a letter to be sent requesting completion of their punchlists. Projects include: Cowboy Road House, 1st Bank of Tetons, KJ Mobile Home.

There are still some projects who have not submitted as-built drawings to Public Works. These also need to be contacted to get the information we are missing. Projects include: Timberline, KJ Mobile Home Park, and Mt Shadows.

Planning and Zoning
There was brief discussion held about the intersection of Highway 33 and Highway 31 and the vision problem that occurs when one is either walking or trying to drive through it. City Planner Bill Knight relayed a situation he had where he almost got hit by a car. Further discussion needs to be held to find a way to rectify this potentially life-threatening situation.

Cari Golden informed the Council of the problems with the new permitting software and what extra costs could be associated with it. She is also checking with other vendors to see what they have to offer.

Administrative
City Administrator Craig Sherman discussed his attending the meeting with the county on animal control. Council decided to cancel attending the October 14th meeting with the County Commissioners. A reminder of the October 22nd quarterly work meeting.

Councilman Scott Fitzgerald updated Council on the Heart and Soul local advisory committee selection process, finding a project coordinator, finalization of budgets and mentioned the next visit of the Orton foundation to be in mid-November.

Bills
Motion was made and seconded to pay the bills. The ayes were unanimous with a show of hands. Meeting was adjourned.

New Envision Victor Website

So that you can easily find information pertaining to Envision Victor, we have set up a blog specific to the project. You can find a link on the menu to the right or click the link below:


This blog will return to its original mission of providing weekly information about the City of Victor. Come back to read City Council minutes, agendas, etc. Thanks!

Envision Victor Local Adivsory Committee Meeting minutes Oct 21st

Committee Members Present: Scott Fitzgerald, Tim Adams, Mike O’Neill, Kathy Rinaldi

Guests: Troy Barry, Dahvi Wilson, Lea Colasuonno, Bill Owca, Bill Knight


1) Review minutes from September Meeting
2) Updates from City Council meetings that relate to the Orton Grant
3) Discussion regarding Meeting and communication guidelines
4) Review Daft Mission Statement
5) Advisory Committee Community Members Selection
6) Draft Job Description for Project Coordinator


Moving forward all documents need to be attached and on Google Docs.

City Council: council talked about budget. John Carney said budget could be fluid. Orton to pay 1/2 of Project Coordinator and city 1/2 to enable to hire a full time, shared job with two very specific objectives. Need clarification from city on what they want/need.

Scott discussed funding for Project Coordinator, city can help fund grant writer to go toward Project Coordinator. $100K from Orton is flexible. Orton committed to doing what it takes for project to be successful. Starting slow to make sure process works so that in the end can go fast to implement. Importance on laying the groundwork well.

Committee groundwork: Scott discussed times, responsibilities, etc. Tim will come up with committee responsibility form. 8:45a to 10:15a as time. (Scott will email guidelines). Tim talked about voting weights with representations, i.e. each partner would represent one vote and each citizen member would receive one vote. Discussion on what would constitute a quorum. Each partner will have one vote (ie. TVTAP, VARD, Cof V, and At Large). On major votes, each partnership will have to have representation. Troy mentioned a communication avenue to ensure that someone isn’t left out, ie. Proxy, blog spot, etc. Email communication ground rules. Email goes to all members. Quorum constitutes representation from each partner (TVTAP, VARD and Victor) – 3. Voting will be of majority rule.

Consecutive misses, 3 consecutive meetings missed partner will be asked to reevaluate participation of member.

Discussion: How to take/accept public comments, set aside block of time for public to speak. Add some flexibility in involving public so we are efficient in taking public comment and being productive. Tim will incorporate language on how to interact/include public comment

Review Daft Mission Statement

Discussion on Advisory Committee mission. Long or short term mission. Should be able to be dynamic and needs flexibility. Will continue discussion on broad or specific mission via email.

Advisory Committee Community Members Selection

Discussion if matrix works. Talk about historic candidates.

Draft Job Description for Project Coordinator

Scott will email draft from John Carney.

Action Items for next meeting (Tim). Project Coordinator is so important should have draft, comments on draft Job Description and final Job Description. Scott will combine the two drafts: one from last meeting and one from John Carney and send out to group for comment.

Tim will send draft of committee responsibilities.

Next meeting date, John Carney coming out to visit Nov. 19-21. Next meeting Nov. 20th at 8:45a.

Tim will have Job Description done by Monday, Oct. 27th. Group will try to make decision on invitations to committee by Oct. 29th with top three names to be emailed to Scott and Tim.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Transportation Plan Open House

iPhoto
On Monday Oct 6th we had our First Transportation Plan Open House at City Hall. Landsman Transportation has been working with our planning staff, members of the local transportation committee, and now they want to hear from you the citizen of Victor. Please take a moment to look over the survey below and email me your responses. The more input we have from you now the better our Transportation Plan and our Envision Victor project will be.

Transportation Plan Survey.pdf

iPhoto

iPhoto

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Transportation Open House Monday Oct 6th 5-7pm

Our first community gathering related to Envision Victor is Monday at City Hall from 5-7pm. Come by and meet representatives from Landsman Transportation who have been hired to help us develop a Transportation Plan for Victor. Also on hand will be City Staff, Council Members, and Members of the Local Transportation Advisory Committee.

As with all the aspects of Envision Victor, we hope to engage as many citizens as possible in the creation of our Transportation Plan. Tonights meeting is not about telling you what is being decided about local transportation issues, but rather an opportunity for you to tell us your thoughts on how our transportation issues should be tackled. Come by and help us break the mold of traditional planning efforts!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Envision Victor

As I hope you know by now, Victor was awarded one of four Orton Family Foundation's Heart and Soul grants. The award includes $100,000 plus technical and professional assistance from the Foundation. This is a tremendous opportunity for our citizens to build on the great work that has been done in Victor in the past such as the Community Action Plan (2003), Victor Comprehensive Plan (2006), EPA Smart Growth Technical Assistance Grant (2006). The City of Victor has two primary partners in this project: Valley Advocates for Responsible Development (VARD) and Teton Valey Trails and Pathways (TVTAP).

We have named the project Envision Victor and it will span at least the next two years. Envision Victor will ask citizens of Victor to articulate the heart and soul of Victor. Those stories, places, and values will be used to to shape how our town grows and will contribute specifically, to finalizing design work for our downtown core

One of the first steps in the project is to form a local citizen advisory committee to steer the project. To begin with, the committee will consist of 8 members; two from each of the three partner organizations and two members from the public at large. This committee will begin their work by developing criteria for hiring a part time project coordinator who will be responsible for organizing and managing the project on a day to day basis. All the Envision Victor committee meetings associated with this project will be open the public.

Goals for Envision Victor include:

- Engage as many residents as possible in Envision Victor, both long-time residents and more recent arrivals.

- Identify and articulate the Heart & Soul attributes of Victor: those values, qualities, events, and places that reflect Victor’s truly unique identity.

- Build Heart & Soul elements into land use decisions or policies such as a downtown plan, a transportation plan, design guidelines, or ordinances.

- Use new tools, high-tech and conventional, to identify and visualize alternative scenarios that assist with land-use decisions.

- Create a series of Sub-Committees to steer individual aspects of the project.

- Integrate the Transportation Plan and the downtown Victor Plan.

- Adopt design review guidelines and standards for downtown Victor.

- Identify new public/private partnerships that could contribute to downtown growth and resilience.


As part of the Envision Victor project, and related to the Heart & Soul Community Planning award, Victor has engaged Landsman Transportation Planning, LLC, of Portland, Oregon. Landsman will work closely with the Victor Transportation Advisory Committee comprised of Victor citizens and area stakeholders, such as START, the area mass transit service, and develop a comprehensive transportation plan. The transportation plan, an integral part of Envision Victor, will focus on the following elements:

- Street Connectivity: Devise new ways to connect and expand Victor's network of streets.

- Speeding on Main Street and other streets: work with ITD to reconcile local needs and desires with State Transportation requirements and regulations.


- Main Street and Center Street: design guidelines including intersection treatment.

- Parking: Develop and implement safe and creative public parking strategies in the downtown core.

Envision Victor and the transportation plan, are two important projects designed to strengthen Victor’s unique sense of place as it faces growth and change. The success of both efforts will depend on citizen participation. Victor’s citizens are best qualified to identify the qualities that make this town special and I encourage you to participate. More information about both efforts will be available in the next several weeks. If you have questions in the meantime, please me at scott@victorcityidaho.com.

Our next Advisory Committee Meeting will be held on October 21st at 8:30am in City Hall.

Moose Cross a Huge Success! 2 More Races scheduled for Oct 4th and 18th

Picasa Web Albums - Scott - MooseCross 2008
Chellie Terry Strikes a pose on the announcers platform.


Troy Barry owns the run up.

On Saturday Sept 20th, 2008 Victor, ID changed. No longer a sleepy town in the shadows of Driggs to the North and Jackson to the East, it became a destination cycling town! If you haven't looked around lately you may have missed the fact that CycloCross racing is sweeping the country from Gloucester, MA to Seattle, WA. This is a style of bike racing that appeals to hard core racers, weekend warriors, and casual cyclists alike. Train all year for 'Cross glory or jump off the couch and give it a shot for the fun of it. And that's exactly what 80+ racers did last Saturday.
Picasa Web Albums - Scott - MooseCross 2008
Yes, my moment of glory! Hole Shot on turn one, trying to run from the Chicken!

As one of the race orgainizers I was overwhelmed by the success of this event. We had racers from Salt Lake, Boise, Ketchum, Missoula, Bozeman, Boston, and of course Driggs, Victor, and Jackson. Hundreds of spectators lined the course waving cowbells, and the talk all day was how everyone couldn't wait to come back and race again, "even if gas was 17 dollars a gallon next year, I would make a point to get back to Moose Cross" - The Reverend - Church of the Big Ring. Read his entire blog here.

One of the best races of the day was the under 12 year old kids race. Over a dozen little rippers tore around a condensed MooseCross course complete with chicanes, barriers, and woop dees. I can't explain the stoke these kids had to be racing their bikes. Truly awesome!
Picasa Web Albums - Scott - MooseCross 2008
Coming down the homestretch

Picasa Web Albums - Scott - MooseCross 2008
Every kid received a commemorative Cowbell

Picasa Web Albums - Scott - MooseCross 2008
The Chicken holds off an attack on the buff pavement.

Check out full results and info about the next 2 races HERE.

Monday, August 18, 2008

2008/2009 Proposed Budget

Below is how the proposed '08/09 Budget stands. On Wednesday August 27th we'll be conducting the public hearing to discuss the budget. If you have questions / concerns this is your chance to voice them. I strongly encourage everyone to look over the budget and come to the meeting prepared if you have requests. Once the budget gets to the public hearing stage we are pretty far into the process. Therefore it is more challenging to change things. But not impossible. A well thought out presentation will be considered seriously.


Friday, August 15, 2008

The Orton Foundation Arrives

John Carney from the Rocky Mountain branch of the Orton Foundation will be arriving next Wednesday August 20th for initial planning work on our Heart and Soul project. As a recap, the Heart and Soul project is a 2 year $100k planning project for Victor. Next week John is looking to meet with Victor citizens who are interested in learning more about this project and sharing their views on Victor. If you have anytime on Thursday the 21st and Friday the 22nd to meet with John send me an email with times that work for you: scottf@victorcityidaho.com

As we get into the Fall there will be a series of community meetings which we'll keep you posted on.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Meet the new urbanists (08/05/2008)

Lisa Haidostian, ClimateWire reporter

A white picket fence, a well-manicured lawn and a cute little house owned by ... a recently graduated twentysomething?

Not so much.

The suburbs, which since World War II have dominated the American real estate scene, are suffering an identity crisis. Baby boomers are nearing retirement age, people are marrying and having kids later in life, and college graduates are flocking to cities. Housing experts say these cultural and aging shifts have slammed the door on the era of urban sprawl.

Add to the mix crippling energy prices, rising awareness of climate change and the glorification of urban lifestyles in hit shows like "Friends" and "Sex and the City," and you've got yourself a housing revolution, experts say.

"With the demographic changes, I think that we are going to see a different development paradigm than we've seen in the past," said David Goldberg, spokesman for Smart Growth America, a national coalition of groups that promotes walkable communities and sustainable development.

But there's only so much city, and not everyone can afford to get it. According to Chris Leinberger, a top land use strategist and director of the graduate real estate program at the University of Michigan, home prices in urban communities have "gone through the roof." As evidence, he cited a recent Brookings Institution study showing a 40 to 200 percent price premium on a price-per-square-foot basis for walkable urban housing.

"That's pent-up demand speaking. That's the market speaking," he said. "I never thought I'd say this, but it's a supply-side problem. We don't have enough supply."

Enter "smart growth" communities, on which Leinberger said developers will place "considerably more focus" when the current housing slump straightens out. Often taking the form of redevelopment projects, such communities feature mixed-use zoning, easy access to public transportation and a general focus on energy-efficient design.

"We have this climate crisis to deal with, and at least a piece of that will be how we deal with transportation," Goldberg said. "The best way to [reduce greenhouse gas emissions] is to meet this rising demand for conveniently located homes in walkable neighborhoods."

The American Dream, Part 2

Geoff Anderson, president and chief executive of Smart Growth America, noted recently that a real estate consulting firm found about a third of the market wanted to live in walkable urban communities. That figure, he said, is "expected to accelerate because of some demographic changes and changes in buyer preferences."

Changing households are key, he said, noting that in 1960 about 48 percent of households were composed of a mom, a dad and two kids. By 2025, only 28 percent will have that makeup, eliminating issues like transporting a large brood.

Further, as the population grows older, many say they don't want to maintain a large lot and hop in the car for a run to the dry cleaner. "The baby boom generation, as it always has in the U.S., is going to be driving changes," Anderson said.

Job opportunities and the desire for high-density neighborhoods are making urban communities even more popular for young singles and recent graduates, adding more fuel to the smart-growth development fire.

And, Goldberg noted, exurbs were hit hardest by the mortgage crisis, while many urban areas held their value. The suburban market model, he said, is "looking a little shaky these days."

But more intriguing even than changing demographics, experts say, are the ways in which new communities seem to be leading a climate-conscious charge.

"We believe that the asphalt-intensive sprawl that dominates our landscape is no one's idea of the American Dream," Smart Growth America's Web site proclaims.
The most fuel-efficient car is the one that's barely driven

The main tenets of "smart growth" are to create safe, affordable neighborhoods built with the environment's best interests in mind. They aim to have mixed-use zoning and easy access to public transportation and to promote clean air and water. Along with boasting LEED-certified buildings and other sustainable gold stars, the communities are designed to dramatically reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to downsize their carbon footprint.

A report released recently by the Urban Land Institute found that compact urban development, as opposed to sprawl, could reduce VMT by 20 to 40 percent. Another reported that public transit displaces about 16.6 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions from private vehicles every year. And two other housing studies found that multi-family buildings use an average of almost 50 percent less energy than single-family detached units.

The poster child: Atlantic Station. Based in Midtown Atlanta, Ga., the community is a 138-acre redevelopment of the old Atlantic Steel mill. Started in 1997 and officially opened in 2005, the project will ultimately have 6 million square feet of Class A, LEED-certified office space and 3,000 to 5,000 residential units, planners say.

The whole idea is that people can walk to both work and to their errands or entertainment -- no car necessary. There's a clean-fueled transit shuttle system that carries about 60,000 people a month to and from a nearby transit site, along with a parking garage underground, on top of which is commercial space, on top of which are condominiums.

The result? A puny average of 8.6 miles traveled daily per resident of the site. People who work but don't live in Atlantic Station clock in a bit higher at 12 miles a day -- still comparatively insignificant to a number that can often be in the hundreds for suburbanites with long commutes. In total, their carbon footprint is reduced by about 60 percent because of the mixed-use nature of the project and transportation impacts, according to Brian Leary, vice president for design and retail at AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp., one of the development firms that masterminded the project.

Zoning laws still a barrier

For now, the housing crash has put the brakes on most smart-growth development, Goldberg said. There are also several obstacles in the way of the developments, not the least of which is legality.

Leinberger said that in 95 percent of America, only drivable suburban developments can legally be built because of zoning laws and rigid construction regulations like height limits or labor requirements.

"In essence, we have a system that makes the right thing hard and the wrong thing easy," he said. Because there are so many hoops to jump through, he said, a developer will "throw his hands up and say, 'Aw, too much trouble.'" Meanwhile, the suburban fringe is being "massively subsidized" because it's so easy to build there.

Known to be "unbelievably complex and risky," smart-growth projects require a totally new way of development, Leinberger said. He compared it to a race car driver suddenly being told he has to become a fighter jet pilot. "It's a fundamentally different skill set that we in real estate have to learn to pull off that kind of a project," he said.

But he and other experts agree that if laws can be changed, the market for smart-growth communities will skyrocket. Most zoning regulations exist at the local level, but Goldberg said the federal transportation bill, which expires at the end of fiscal year 2009, is the "big mondo policy change that really we gotta take a serious look at." He thinks the bill should shift transportation funding away from encouraging highways and toward encouraging transit systems.

"There are very few people," he said, "who fail to recognize this as some sort of turning point."

Friday, July 25, 2008

Victor wins $100k Grant!

This past Spring the City of Victor applied for a very coveted Heart and Soul grant with the help of VARD and Stephanie Thomas (Grant Writer). What do you know, we won! Check out the press release below and keep coming back to this blog for more info about the upcoming process.


ORTON FOUNDATION BEGINS $10 MILLION HEART & SOUL COMMUNITY PLANNING INITIATIVE

Four towns in New England and Rocky Mountain regions selected for a program moving community planning back into the hands of citizens

July 25, 2008

Middlebury, VT -- The Orton Family Foundation has committed $10 million in cash and staff over the next five years in a major new initiative to stem the tide of “anywhere USA” development and help communities strengthen their unique spirit of place as they face growth and change.

Biddeford, ME; Damariscotta, ME; Golden, CO; and Victor, ID (all under 23,000 in population) are the first communities to be awarded $100,000 each plus Foundation staff support to help them tap into their own citizens’ wisdom about what is best for their towns.

For decades, most planning has been top down, with economic growth a driving force behind many land use decisions. “We should challenge the single-minded notion that if it’s good for the economy, approve it,” said Lyman Orton, Board Chair and Founder of the Foundation. “After all, are we just an economy, or are we a society?” Values-based Heart & Soul Community Planning entrusts the future of a town to those who know it best—its citizens.

While growth sustains towns, it can lead to disastrous results without the awareness of an empowered citizenry with a strong identity. In a Heart & Soul planning approach, as many local people as possible first identify the qualities that make their town special. Then those qualities and places most valued are broadly acknowledged and used as touchstones in revising ordinances, reviewing projects and making decisions.

In a series of gatherings, events, meetings, interviews and polling, the four towns will learn to take action to protect and strengthen those assets for the future. In addition to its grants, the Foundation contributes expertise and training on using innovative tools such as CommuntyViz™ visioning and analysis software, keypad polling, online surveys and other ways to increase citizen participation.

“We believe a diversity of citizens have the wisdom and ability to steer the change in their communities,” said Bill Roper, President and CEO of the Foundation. “Through our Heart & Soul initiative, we’re giving people the power and confidence to engage and enhance their unique places for many years to come.

In a collaborative effort with citizen’s groups, non-profits, developers, municipal governments, the planning community and others across the country, the Orton Family Foundation aims to transform planning so that residents can live, work and play in the places they cherish, and ensure that their towns are thriving and livable for their grandchildren.

”We build partnerships to build and sustain community,” said Roper. “We’ve found that when towns have some skin in the game, they are even more determined to work hard for lasting results.” That means each town provides matching funding in a combination of dollars and in-kind contributions. Volunteers, every town’s greatest asset, bring hours of their time and talent to the table, and other partnerships are formed to bring as many views and abilities to the table as possible. The communities were chosen after responding to the Foundation's Request for Proposals.

Nationally, the Foundation is working with many other individuals and organizations to build a Community Heart & Soul network of practitioners, citizens and towns to share ideas, lessons and successes and seed the kind of change that will put the future back into the hands of local residents.

The Orton Family Foundation, based in Middlebury, Vermont, serves cities and towns under 50,000 in population in the Northeast and Rocky Mountain West. It was created in 1995 by Lyman Orton, owner of the Vermont Country Store, and is supported with profits from the Store.

For more information contact:

Joh Barstow, Director of Communications
The Orton Family Foundation

802.388.6336
PO Box 111
Middlebury, VT 05753
communications@orton.org
www.orton.org

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

The Budget Process Cometh

The following is an op-ed to appear in the TVN on July 31st.

What an exciting time of the year this is! Fourth of July celebrations, music festivals, bbq's and most importantly it's time to work through your City's budget process once again. You've waited patiently all year to review last year's budget against the actual numbers like a kid on Christmas Eve tossing and turning frantically in bed waiting to finally run down stairs and rip into the new toys under the tree. Or maybe you're like most people and haven't actually found the thrill of the budget process yet and just read a blurb about it in the paper every year.

Ok, I must admit that as a new Council member I am very new to the budget process and I actually wasn't eagerly anticipating the extra budget meetings I've been sitting through. In fact I was dreading the whole affair quite frankly. I wasn't sure where to begin, how to formulate my opinions, and have no previous municipal budgeting experience to draw upon. Luckily, at this year's Association of Idaho Cities conference I sat in on a budgeting workshop and learned about a great book called “The Price of Government” which advocates a process called Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO). Although I wouldn't exactly call it a page turner, it did get me excited about actively participating in the budget process. It made me realize that the budget is where it all goes down. This is where the action is, where the look and feel of your City is decided, and where YOUR money gets spent.

Of course the budget process can be boring, frustrating, draining, and painstakingly slow. That's where BFO comes in. This methodology guides the process with a level of common sense and transparency that takes away the sting of the whole experience. While budgeting might not be for everyone, this certainly makes it way more bareable.

It will take a few years to fully utilize BFO in Victor, but we have opportunity this year to take the first steps. Step one: actively engage the public more in the process. So here I am asking all the citizens of Victor to email me your wish list and come to our budget hearing on August 27th. It's an opportunity for every citizen to come forth and let us know where we did well, where we screwed up, and how you want the City to operate in the future. The budget process is a lot like voting. If you don't go to the polls, you can't complain about the results.

Councilmen Attend AIC Conference

This post is a little outdated, but just to let the general public know what's going on I thought I'd share the info. From June 24th - 27th Councilmen Kearsley, Bergart, and Fitzgerald attended the Association of Idaho Cities Conference in Boise, ID. Here's a quick breakdown of a few seminars we attended:

- Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention
- Transportation Funding
- Water Issues Affecting Idaho Cities
- Effective City Council Meetings
- Understanding Access Management
- Water Hot Topics
- Environmental Forum
- Grants for Street Projects
- Best Practices in Municipal Budgeting
- Grants from the Dept of Commerce
- Developing Capital Improvements Plans
- City and County Relationships
- The EFC Financial Dashboard

Other highlights included a speech by Governor Otter on Transportation funding, and a speech by political analyst David Gergen on the state of the Presidential Election. Overall I was thoroughly impressed with the conference and it's relevance to Victor. I look forward to going back next year.

PS. Had a chance to ride the Idaho VeloPark. Pioneer Park perhaps?

Monday, June 30, 2008

Jackson Spill Over

Here is a link to a study just completed by the Sonoran institute. It documents growth impacts in the Teton region of Wyoming and Idaho. I have also heard this report referred to as the "Jackson spill over study." Don't be scared of reading it. There are nice photos and it's short, but definitely a worthwhile read.

www.sonoran.org

Thursday, June 5, 2008

June 11th Agenda - City Council

7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance
7:02 Minutes
7:10 Bob Hardy – Final Audit
7:30 Sunrise Engineering
8:00 Mountain Shadows Developer’s Agreement
8:30 Trail Creek Crossing Developer’s Agreement
9:00 Blackhawk Estates – Final Plat

Visitors
Maintenance
P&Z
Administrative
Fall River Annual Meeting
Bond Counsel for Sewer Bond

Calendaring

Arbor Day & Community Picnic – June 14th

Budget Workshop – June 18th 7:00 p.m.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

START BUS

Any thoughts on the START bus? START is conducting a survey of Teton Valley riders about current usage and bus times. Email jsowder@startbus.com and ask for a survery.

What's your walk score

What is your walk score?

This site helps homebuyers, renters, and real estate agents find houses and apartments in great neighborhoods. Walk Score shows you a map of what's nearby and calculates a Walk Score for any property. Buying a house in a walkable neighborhood is good for your health and good for the environment."

http://www.walkscore.com/

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Ensuring Development Pays for Itself: Understanding the Costs and Revenues of Development

We are very fortunate to have two outstanding and engaging guest presenters who are looking forward to answering questions and having a good discussion with partipants. Bill Collins is President for Collins Planning Associates and former Teton County, WY Planning Director. Jonathan Schechter is Executive Director for the Charture Institute and a Jackson Hole News & Guide columnist.

Driggs City Hall 7:00-8:30pm. See you there!

If you have any questions or comments, you can reach us at 208-354-1707 or email info@tetonvalleyadvocates.org.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Story of Stuff

Since the last post had to do with recycling I thought I'd post a link to this interesting web site called "the story of stuff" It talks about the process of how goods are created from extraction to production to distribution to consumption to disposal and everything involved along the way. Makes you think that abandoning the landfill, sorting garbage, and the county's new recycle program are steps in the right direction. But there is more as a community we can do!
www.Storyofstuff.com

Monday, May 12, 2008

Recycling in Teton Valley



TVCR Report / May 6, 2008: Recycling Collection in Teton Valley
Dear Supporters of Recycling,
Teton County's Recycling Program Starts MAY 10!
Located at the new transfer station across from the old landfill.
(A map is available on our website www.tetonrecycling.org)
May 10th is FREE Trash Day, so your first drop will be free. After this, a small will be collected. Details at bottom of note.

Recyclables will include :
  • Glass Containers: All colors mixed together - don't worry about labels etc
  • Paper: Mixed office paper. No magazines at this time.
  • Newspaper: ad papers as well and phone books
  • Corrugated Cardboard: Boxes must be relatively clean and flattened.
  • Aluminum Cans: all sizes
  • Steel/Tin Cans: Please rinse to keep
Visit our website for more information.
RELATED PROGRAMS
Plastic Bags
Plastic #2 shopping bags and clear bulk bags are being collected at Broulims for recycling by bulk.
Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)
Household Hazardous Waste must be separated out and taken to Jackson Recycling. They charge a fee which will be reimbursed by our county if you bring your receipt to the Court House. More information about HHW will be available at the Transfer Station and on our website.
Electronic Waste (E-Waste)
Most electronics – TVs, computers, monitors, stereos etc., are best separated and recycled. The toxic components as well as recyclable parts are best handled by professionals. Jackson has a system for providing this service. Please use it.
We are working with the county to provide HHW and Ewaste collection systems here.
The Fee System
Small and Large haulers will be directed to different areas to create more convenient trash handling for both groups.
Small Household/Self-Haulers: Will pay a base $2.00 fee.
This will cover two 30 gallon bags of garbage and small quantities of sorted materials: Glass, paper, cans, cardboard, wood and brush (sod, dimensional lumber). You will not have to go over the scale but will be directed to a smaller collection bin area for quick drop off. If you have up to five 30 gallon bags of mixed garbage you will pay $1.00 per additional bag.

Larger Haulers: More than 5 bags, and larger loads – sorted and mixed - will go across the scale and be charged on a sliding scale with sorted materials being cheaper than mixed trash.

TRANSFER STATION SUMMER HOURS
8AM to 5PM
Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays

TND Meeting

Mark your calendar for Wednesday May 28th. Victor will be having its Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) hearing and accepting public comment. Exact time on the agenda TBA, but the meeting starts at 7pm. Once the time is official I'll post it.

Agenda for Council Meeting 5-14-08

Here's the latest Agenda for this wednesday's Council meeting. This agenda can change up to the meeting day.

7:00 Pledge of Allegiance
7:02 Minutes
7:10 Alice Stevenson – BiMonthly Visit
7:40 Teton County Recycling – Program Update
8:00 Mountain Shadows – Final Plat – Public Hearing
9:00 Blackhawk Estates – Preliminary Plat – Public Hearing
10:00 Sunset Village – Continuation of Public Hearing

Visitors
Maintenance
P&Z
Administrative
Driggs Fireworks
Calendaring
Second Council Meeting in June

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Opposition View of TND

This email was sent to the city and thought it would be worth a post. I just had a great conversation with Tom and think this opinion is worth considering. Thanks for the input Tom, -Scott

"I was doing a little snooping around the internet about Victor and found this web site:

http://www.ecospace.cc/ecoproducts/mountainside-sustainable-neighborhood-1207.htm

I want to make a comment about my feelings about Mountainside Village. I think that it is the most rediculous piece of planning for this valley I have ever seen. It is not "forward-looking" design and it is not inspirational to say the least! We do not like that kind of density and I am surprised that the City of Victor allowed it. The roofs are so close together and so steep, that a child could be playing in between the buildings when the ice and snow slides off and get killed. There is no privacy. This type of clostrophobic living is what people move here to get away from! If this is anything like what is slated as a Traditional Neighborhood Overlay, I say dump it now! How in the world can "this type of design...increase vitality and productivity in Victor"? The residents of communities like that become like chickens that peck themselves to death in their little tiny cages. High density living does not increase vitality, rather it reduces the quality of life. We moved from San Diego, California to escape this kind of high density nonsense. To me, it's all about profits. Developers want high density to increase profits. Cities want high density to increase revenues. This is where common sense takes a back seat to profits. Is it any wonder, when people live on top of one another that they, like the chickens, start to peck at each other and become maladjusted? The streets, rather than becoming a place where people hang out on the porch to visit with the neighbors, are taken over by gangs.

Here is an excerpt from the above web page:

Mountainside Village is a leader in forward-looking design on a local level as well. Officially incorporated into the town of Victor, Idaho, it has become an inspiration for the city’s City Planner, Bill Knight. Re-energized by the warm look and feel, Mr. Knight is leading an effort to encourage the incorporation of Traditional Neighborhood Design principles into the development of downtown Victor.

“When knitted into the town plan,” Knight explains, “this type of design will increase vitality and productivity in Victor.” Based on this vision, Knight is currently in the process of presenting Victor’s planning and zoning committee with plans to implement a new, Traditional Neighborhood zoning overlay, slated to surround the center of town. This parallel zone will allow landowners to develop Victor’s town center in way that enhances its warm, neighborhood feeling, preserves the aesthetics of its streetscape, and encourages pedestrian and bicycle transport – many of the same values that Mountainside Village seeks to promote in its community."

Tom Egbert
Victor, ID

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Good Article on TND

The subprime crisis is just the tip of the iceberg. Fundamental changes in American life may turn today’s McMansions into tomorrow’s tenements.

Click HERE to Read more of this article from Atlantic.com.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

TND Survey

Looking over the survey data there were lots of great comments about the traditional neighborhood design left by attendees. I picked one for, one neutral, and one against the tnd and added some additional comments.

For the TND:

“A TND design will ensure a growth plan that will meet the needs of our changing world much more than sprawl. “Walkable, “eyes on the streets”, private backyards, save on sewer with density, save on street paving, with density, save on busing when kids can walk to school and watch our property values retain their integrity.”

It is true our world is changing. The US census says:


This country’s population is changing, and so are its real estate preferences. These lifestyle changes have significant implications for development. For the first time, there are more single-person households (26.4 percent) than married-couple-with-children households (23.3 percent). The groups growing the fastest, people in their mid-20s and empty nesters in their 50s, are the groups most likely to look for an alternative to low-density, single-family housing.

US census


This means that some of our new and/or older residents will be seeking exactly what the TND would provide – an alternative to low-density, single family housing. Currently our housing market is lacking inventory in this area, while we have a 30 year supply of lots that are outside the city core with lower densities. This un-balanced situation contradicts our comprehensive plan which states that we should “encourage opportunities for a diversity of housing choices.” Ultimately, having many different housing options is important to our community. It will help ensure that opportunities for home ownership are open to a wider spectrum of income levels.

There is lots of data out there to support the rest of the comments. I’d only add that initial paving and sewer costs are put on the developer, but maintenance and up keep are the cities responsibility. It is very expensive for the city to service water and sewer pipes, roads, pump stations, and plow. By condensing these services it will be cheaper for the city.

Neutral

“I appreciate the open house to explain what’s going on in the city. I have mixed feelings on the TND concept. I hate to see the smaller homes going up but I do think we need to take advantage of what property is available. As long as it enhances the beauty of our city – I guess it is for the best – also brings more taxpayers.”


It’s okay to have mixed feelings about this. Remember a TND is not for everyone. If you have an adverse reaction to the set backs or density it is important to remember that you don’t have to live in one. Even without living in one, there are still community benefits.

1.) Homes located near TND neighborhoods are worth more. When you live in or next to a nice, safe, attractive neighborhood your property values increase.

2.) The city will ultimately save money by having to provide less service to far out future sub divisions (sewer/water upkeep and maintenance, snow plowing…) Ultimately this would allow Victor to put that money in other areas.

3.) Having more people within walking distance to downtown would help bring in more local businesses and help keep our current ones going.


Against the TND

“The reason I enjoy living in a rural area is because it is rural. City density as close as a traditional neighborhood is too dense for a rural area. Not that sprawl is everywhere but not that dense. Does not allow reasonable snow removal.”

I agree, I LOVE living in a rural setting. More then anything I want to maintain and protect our valleys rural lifestyle. Rural areas are better for those who choice to work the land, it is better for our wildlife, and it helps preserve our valley’s beauty.

Development pressures are currently threatening our rural lands. The fact that more people want to move to Victor is beyond anyone’s control. Without good planning, we will witness our rural lands get gobbled up by sub-division after sub-division.

I believe one solution to save our rural land is the TND. The proposed TND box is a half mile in each direction from our city center which even by current zoning is not classified as rural. The idea is, by increasing density within this small box, we will help protect everything outside the box. We are trying to create a density gradient – Having it most dense in the city core and having it taper off as you get further and further away.

There are thousands of TND’s all over the country. Almost all pre-WW2 housing was TND, but as far as new development goes there is currently 18 in Colorado, 9 in Michigan, 9 in Wisconsin, 1 in Montana, 3 in Utah, and 2 in New York. These places all have one thing in common. Snow! We can come up with solutions to deal with snow. Other communities all over the country handle it very successfully.

Thank you

Thank you to everyone who came out to our open house last Thursday night. It really got me fired up about all the people who care and want to be informed about what is happening in Victor. Many have said they had no idea of the work that is going on and want to continue to be kept in the loop. I hope that this blog is one more way to stay informed.

It was a nice reminder that community members have similar values and ideas of which direction we want Victor headed. As a council member I work for us all and it is important to make sure I am on the right track representing our vision. Thank you.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Great training opportunity!

Conservation Voters for Idaho is hosting a one-day Campaign Training in Driggs and we need your help in getting the word out to people who may be interested.

If YOU are interested in attending, email me now! If you know people who may be interested, please forward this!

About the Campaign Training:
This training is comprehensive, and an invaluable resource to participants who have never experienced campaign training—as well as those who have prior training experience. The training is geared towards candidates and campaign managers/key volunteers.

Date: Saturday, April 5th

Time: 9 am – 5 pm

Place: Driggs (location will be sent to participants after they register)

Workshop Cost: Free to participants who apply through Conservation Voters for Idaho (includes lunch and workshop materials)

Trainer: Lee Flinn, Conservation Voters for Idaho


Participants will learn how to:

1. Determine how many votes are needed to win a race
2. Write an effective campaign plan
3. Create and carry out a field plan
4. Raise funds to carry out a winning campaign


Space is limited, so please let me know right away if you are interested in attending!

I hope to hear from you soon. Thanks!

Lee Flinn - lee@conservationvotersforidaho.org

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND)

If you've been wondering what TND stands for here's your chance to find out. Traditional Neighborhood Design is a reference to the style of community building popular in the United States before World War II. TND's typically have a variety of housing sizes, close together, with set back garages at the end of skinny driveways. The houses are fronted with porches and built right up to the curb with only a small front yard. The streets in a TND are narrow, usually have parallel parking, a planting strip for trees, and then a sidewalk before reaching the front yards. Often there is a more sizeable back yard and even a service alley behind that.

But wait, there's more. A successful TND is a true mixed use development. Remember the "corner store" that seems to have disappeared in the modern subdivision. Well it's back in the TND. Along with town homes, row houses, and some light commercial. Ideally a resident in a TND could walk or ride a bike to the corner store for milk and along the way greet their neighbors who are sitting on their porch. A TND resident may even be able to walk to work while their child walks to school. If you think of a great neighborhood from your childhood, it's probably a TND.

So, what's that got to do with Victor. Victor is currently considering a TND zoning overlay for a one square mile block of downtown. This size was arrived at by looking at the distance someone can easily walk in 15 minutes. This optional zoning overlay is intended to encourage infill development by offering density bonuses to downtown land owners. Infill development is a way to grow a city from the inside out with a gradual increasing density gradient as you move further away from the city center.

On Wednesday March 19th, there will be an open house at the City Hall from 8:30am to 8:00pm. Valley residents are encouraged to come by and learn all the ins and outs of the TND as well as our upcoming re-addressing and the proposed new Impact Area. After the open house there will be a more formal public hearing during an upcoming Council meeting. The TND ordinance has already passed through the Planning and Zoning Commission 5-0.

Links:
List of TND's across the country.
Mountainside Village - Victor's TND
smartgrowth.org
TND Power Point Presentation